Stuart Arsenault is the co-founder and CEO of Junip, the Canada-based platform enabling 2,500+ eCommerce businesses like Kellogg's, OLIPOP, and KOTN to run product reviews.
In an industry-leading feat, Junip also boasts a review submission rate on request of over 10%. We sat down with Stuart to dive into the company’s roadmap so far, covering topics including:
In Stuart’s words, it’s essentially a given that leveraging reviews for your eCom site improves conversion rates because they generate social proof, contextualize the real-life value of your products, and generally help a static site come alive.
More specifically, three common points of growth for Junip clients are:
Stuart also identified three lesser-known growth sites associated with reviews:
For instance, users and brands alike are accustomed to customers being blasted with emails requesting review submissions.
Yet, as an example, Uber users don’t choose to leave driver reviews after receiving an email weeks post-ride. They chose to do so because they were presented with a low-barrier opportunity to leave a review upon reopening the Uber app.
As Junip’s core product has been built out alongside early customers, the platform has, according to Stuart, reaped valuable insights as well as business from active eCom operators.
In terms of key product feedback that’s influenced their product roadmap, he pointed to two features — both centered around how brands can better execute gathering user reviews.
While text messages have become a staple customer comms channel in eCom, review providers have largely avoided SMS due to significant technical and policy restraints.
For instance, when a brand texts a review submission request to a user who hasn’t yet explicitly given approval for contact at that phone number, this event can quickly raise red flags for the provider and end customer alike.
In response, Junip became the first reviews platform to integrate with Postscript, Attentive, and other leading text-powered review tools, thus enabling brands to message review requests directly through the SMS channels they’ve already utilized.
Meanwhile, on the subscriptions front, Junip will be partnering with Skio and similar platforms to enable brands to gather user reviews through their subscription portals.
This broadly speaks to Junip’s emphasis on powering reviews in less typical categories — in this case, for subscribers and other long-term, high-repeat customers to provide specific feedback on subscription brands, plans, and pricing.
When asked how he would expand the Junip platform if given unlimited time and runway, Stuart pointed to the fact that beyond product reviews as we know them today, feedback could be radically expanded to include buyers’ broader opinions on product ranges, brands, and so on.
After all, Junip and similar enablement players like Skio tend to partner with, in his words, truly thoughtful brands — which in turn attract customers with thoughtful, expansive opinions on these brands and their products.
Although Stuart admits Junip and the larger reviews ecosystem are far from realizing this concept, recent relevant developments include Instagram’s functionality for tagging brands in shoppable posts to be linked to your PDPs.
As for how expansions could potentially tie into the sweeping wave of web3, Stuart believes it will likely be tough to work with the reviews space — in the near term.
He attributes this to the reality that customers are simply unwilling to undergo friction to complete tasks, hence why, despite being the industry leader, Junip’s review submission rate only hovers around 10%.
At this point in time, when web3-powered eCom opportunities (think entering the metaverse to shop) continue to provide greater barriers to entry than the current digital commerce ecosystem, Stuart and the Junip team will be erring on the side of caution and Web 2.0.